Win the ones worth winning.

Generated from each committed award's deadline using the standard backward schedule (decide D-56, draft D-35, assets D-28, reviews D-21, sign-off D-14, submit D-7), plus partner approvals and the shared asset kit. Awards still awaiting a decision show only their go/no-go date. Ticks are saved in this browser only; change status for good in data/awards.json.

Production

Deliverables timeline

Shared assets first, then every active entry in deadline order. Diamonds are official deadlines; the dashed line is today. Faded bars are awards not yet decided. Hover a bar for dates; rows link to the award profile.

Shared asset kit Decide & kick off Draft narrative Assets & video Reviews & sign-off Submit window

Portfolio

Every award on the list

Likelihood is an honest estimate that a well-prepared entry wins or places, given the field and how well the Library fits. Prestige (1–5 stars) weights how much a win would matter to the Library's reputation and fundraising. Click a column to sort.

Budget

What it costs

Entry fees only, for committed entries. Staff time, video editing, and photography are carried by the shared asset kit and are not repeated per entry. Partner-paid entries cost the Library nothing but approval time.

Build once, enter many

The shared asset kit

Nearly every entry asks for the same handful of heavy assets. Produce them once, to the strictest spec on the list, and each entry becomes a one- to two-week tailoring job instead of a six-week scramble.

Who's who

People on the awards

Applications & materials

Drafts, copy and production files

Everything lives in the repo under applications/ and materials/. Start with the urgent queue. Each award profile links to its own draft.

Positioning

Which part of the Library wins

Each award is mapped to the single aspect of the Library that makes its strongest case. The bar is the sum of likelihood × prestige across the awards that lean on it — where the program's expected value actually sits.